|
"Most impaired drivers are never stopped.
Others are stopped, but police often miss signs of impairment.
It has been estimated that close to 1,000 alcohol-impaired
driving trips occur for every arrest. Because the police cannot
catch all offenders, the success of alcohol-impaired driving
laws depends on deterring potential offenders by creating
the public perception that apprehension and punishment of
offenders is likely. Research has shown that likelihood of
apprehension is more important in deterring offenders than
is the severity of punishment. The key to creating this perception
is enforcement. Merely putting strong laws on the books is
not enough. Enforcement efforts must be sustained and well
publicized and create a realistic threat of apprehension."
- The
Insurance Institute of Highway Safety
Fatality
Facts (2002) - Progress has been made in the past 20 years
to reduce the proportion of fatally injured drivers with BACs
at or above 0.08 percent. Proportions are lower in all age
groups. They're lower among drivers of passenger vehicles,
tractor-trailers, and motorcycles. There has also been a substantial
decline among those with very high BACs (>= 0.15 percent),
who are often assumed to be "hard-core" drinking
drivers. Progress has stalled in recent years and alcohol-impaired
driving is still a major problem.
Drunk
Driving Laws DUI / DWI (as of March 2004) - All 50 states
and the District of Columbia have per se laws defining it
as a crime to drive with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC)
at or above a proscribed level, usually 0.08 percent.
National
Drunk Driving Resource - Everything you need to know about
first offender DUI/DWI, drinking, driving and drugs.
A
Review of the Literature on the Effects of Low Doses of Alcohol
on Driving-Related Skills - Historically, deterrence has
been the principal approach for prevention of driving under
the influence of alcohol. Legislatures have established blood
alcohol concentration (BAC(1)) limits for driving and law
enforcement agencies have enforced those laws. Scientists
have contributed to the establishment of BAC limits with data
from experimental and epidemiological studies to identify
the alcohol levels which produce driving skills impairment
and increased crash rates.
Relative
Risk Of Fatal Crash Involvement By BAC, Age, And Gender
(PDF) - This study estimated age and sex specific relative
risk of fatal crash involvement as a function of BAC based
on logistic regression analyses of FARS combined with exposure
data from The 1996 National Roadside Survey. Results showed
that drivers with non-zero BACs below .10, and 16-20 year
old male drivers below .08 BAC pose substantially elevated
risk both to themselves and other road users.
Impaired
Driving in the United States (Cost Fact Sheet) - The Impaired
Driving State Cost Fact Sheets were developed by Dexter Taylor,
Ph.D., Ted R. Miller, Ph.D., and Kenya L. Cox, M.A., of the
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), 2002.
The estimates were produced under the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (contract number DTNHZZ-98-D35079).
The information and opinions presented are attributable to
the authors alone and may not represent the official views
of the sponsoring agency.
Alcohol:
Deterrence and Enforcement (March 2004) - A question and
answer session.
What is "drunk driving?"
The term "drunk driving" is an inaccurate characterization
of the problems caused by motorists who are impaired by alcohol.
The first criminal laws targeting this problem prohibited
"drunk driving," encouraging the notion that the
problem involved drivers who were visibly drunk. In fact,
many alcohol-impaired drivers do not appear drunk in the traditional
way. Research has shown that even small amounts of alcohol
can impair the skills involved in driving, but the persistent
notion that the problem is predominantly one of drunk drivers
has allowed many drinking drivers to decide they are not part
of the problem. For these reasons, the term "alcohol-impaired
driving" is a more accurate and precise description of
what is commonly referred to as "drunk driving."
What does blood alcohol concentration
measure?
Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) describes the amount of
alcohol in a person's blood expressed as weight of alcohol
per unit of volume of blood. For example, at 0.10 percent
BAC, there is 100 mg of alcohol per 100 ml of blood. For most
legal purposes, however, a blood sample is not necessary to
determine a person's BAC. It can be measured much more simply
by analyzing exhaled breath.
What BAC is considered illegal?
Driving with a BAC of 0.10 percent is a crime in 5 states.
It is a crime to drive with a BAC of 0.08 percent in 45 states
and the District of Columbia. A BAC of 0.08 is evidence of
an alcohol violation in Massachusetts. In response to a potential
loss of federal highway funding, all states likely will have
a BAC defining impaired driving at 0.08 percent within the
next few years.
What is the effect of alcohol on driving
skills and crash risk?
At BACs as low as 0.02 percent, alcohol affects driving ability
and crash likelihood. The probability of a crash begins to
increase significantly at 0.05 percent BAC and climbs rapidly
after about 0.08 percent. For drivers age 35 and older with
BACs at or above 0.15 percent on weekend nights, the likelihood
of being killed in a single-vehicle crash is more than 380
times higher than it is for nondrinking drivers.1
How many drinks does it take to reach
significantly impairing BACs?
The effects of alcoholic drinks vary greatly because the rate
of absorption and BACs attained vary from person to person
due to such factors as weight, amount of fat tissue, and stomach
contents. Nevertheless, various organizations have developed
charts intended to help people estimate their BACs based on
the number of drinks consumed. These tables can be used to
estimate BACs, but they are subject to error.
Are beer and wine less impairing
than hard liquor?
Impairment is not determined by type of drink but rather by
the amount of alcohol ingested over a specific period of time.
There is a similar amount of alcohol in such standard drinks
as a 12-ounce glass of beer, a 4-ounce glass of wine, and
1.25 ounces of 80 proof liquor. Beer is the most common drink
consumed by people stopped for alcohol-impaired driving or
involved in alcohol-related crashes.
What proportion of all motor vehicle
crashes is caused by alcohol?
It is impossible to say with certainty. Although alcohol is
known to increase crash likelihood, its presence is neither
necessary nor sufficient to cause a crash. Every crash in
which a driver has a high BAC is not caused by alcohol. To
learn the number of crashes caused by driving at various BACs,
it would be necessary to find out how many trips that do not
involve crashes are driven by people with positive BACs --
something that is only measured periodically in roadside surveys
or special studies of motorists not involved in crashes.
What proportion of motor vehicle crashes
involves alcohol?
The most reliable information about alcohol involvement comes
from fatal crashes. In 2002, 32 percent of fatally injured
drivers had BACs of at least 0.08 percent. Although alcohol
may not have been a causal factor in all of the crashes, this
statistic is frequently used to measure the change over time
in alcohol involvement in fatal crashes.
In 2002, the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) estimated that 35 percent of all traffic
deaths occurred in crashes in which at least one driver or
nonoccupant had a BAC of 0.08 percent or more and that any
alcohol was present in 41 percent of all fatal crashes in
2002.2 Such statistics are sometimes cited as proof that a
third to half of all fatal crashes are caused by "drunk
driving" and that none of the crashes that involve alcohol
would occur if the alcohol were not present. But this is incorrect
and misleading because alcohol is only one of several factors
that contribute to crashes involving drinking drivers. Furthermore,
some fatally injured people in alcohol-related crashes are
pedestrians with positive BACs, and these fatalities still
would occur even if every driver were sober.
Alcohol involvement is much lower in crashes
involving nonfatal injuries, and it is lower still in crashes
that do not involve injuries at all. A study conducted during
the 1960s estimated that 9 percent of drivers in injury crashes
in Grand Rapids, Michigan3 -- 12 percent in Huntsville, Alabama
and in San Diego, according to a study from the 1970s -- had
BACs at or above 0.10 percent. Only 5 percent of drivers had
BACs that high in noninjury crashes in the Grand Rapids study.
During the same time, studies of fatally injured drivers found
40-55 percent had BACs of 0.10 percent or more.
How has the problem of alcohol-impaired
driving changed over time?
The incidence of alcohol-impaired driving has been reduced
in recent years but remains a major problem. The NHTSA and
the Institute undertook a national roadside breath survey
in 1996 -- it was patterned after 1986 and 1973 surveys --
and found that 83 percent of drivers had no measurable alcohol,
a significant increase above the 74 percent rate of sober
drivers in 1986 and the 64 percent rate in 1973.4 Impairment
begins even at low BACs but increases rapidly after 0.05 percent.
The proportion of drivers with high BACs has fallen but less
so in recent years. Overall, 7.7 percent of 1996 drivers had
0.05 percent BACs or higher, compared with 8.4 percent in
1986 and 13.7 percent in 1973.
Do alcohol-related crashes differ by
gender?
Crashes involving men are much more likely than those involving
women to be alcohol-related. Among fatally injured male drivers
of passenger vehicles in 2002, 39 percent had BACs of 0.08
percent or more.2 The corresponding proportion among women
was 18 percent. Alcohol involvement in fatal crashes is highest
for men ages 21-40.
There have been some reports that women are
becoming an increasing part of the alcohol-impaired crash
problem. According to national roadside breath surveys, more
women now are driving at night. The percentage of women in
a weekend nighttime sample of drivers increased from 16 percent
in 1973 to 26 percent in 1986 to 31 percent in 1996.4 The
increase from 1973 to 1986 was accompanied by a reduction
in the percentage of women with high BACs. However, in the
period between 1986 and 1996, the percentage of women drivers
with high BACs has increased slightly, from 1.3 to 1.5 percent.
During this period, the percentage of males with high BACs
dropped from 3.9 to 3.5 percent.
When do alcohol-related crashes occur?
They happen at all hours, but alcohol involvement in crashes
peaks at night and is higher on weekends than on weekdays.
Among passenger vehicle drivers who were fatally injured between
9 p.m. and 6 a.m. in 2002, 59 percent had BACs at or above
0.08 percent compared with 18 percent during other hours.
Forty-five percent of all fatally injured drivers on weekends
(6 p.m. Friday to 6 a.m. Monday) in 2002 had BACs of 0.08
percent or more. During the rest of the week, the proportion
was 25 percent.
Are most alcohol-related crashes caused
by repeat offenders?
No. It is true that drivers with prior convictions for driving
while impaired by alcohol are overrepresented among drivers
in fatal crashes. According to a federal study, drivers convicted
of alcohol-impaired driving in the past three years are at
least 1.8 times as likely to be in fatal crashes as drivers
with no prior convictions during the same time period and
are at least four times as likely to be in fatal crashes in
which drivers have high BACs (0.10 percent or more).5 However,
it is important to note that 87 percent of drivers with high
BACs in fatal crashes have no alcohol convictions during the
previous three years.
MADD
- is a 501(c)(3) non-profit grass roots organization with
more than 600 chapters nationwide. MADD is not a crusade against
alcohol consumption - MADD's mission is to stop drunk driving,
support the victims of this violent crime, and prevent underage
drinking.
Century
Council - The Century Council is a not-for-profit organization
dedicated to fighting drunk driving and underage drinking.
Headquartered in Washington, D.C. and Chaired by Susan Molinari,
The Council develops and implements innovative programs and
public awareness campaigns and promotes action through strategic
partnerships. The Century Council promotes responsible decision-making
regarding drinking or non-drinking of beverage alcohol and
discourages all forms of irresponsible consumption through
education, communications, research, law enforcement, and
other programs.
Canadians
for Safe and Sober Driver - We are constantly gathering
information to highlight Impaired Driving activities in Canada's
10 Provinces as well as from those communities running the
OPERATION LOOKOUT® program. Here you will find information
on associated Canadians for Safe and Sober Driving programs,
organizations and contacts.
Stop
DUI - STOP DUI creates messages for public service announcements,
billboards, bus shelters, bumper stickers, posters and electronic
reader boards. Heightened awareness programs are presented
on the four major holidays of the year.
Drinking
Drivers Defense Network - National network of DUI/DWI
attorneys, ways to avoid a DUI conviction, blood alcohol chart,
myths about defending accused drunk drivers.
DWI
Victims Panel - The DWI Victims Panel has become a model
for use by courts from Alaska to Pennsylvania. Development
information has been provided to inquiring judges throughout
the country. The potential for utilizing this approach is
not limited solely to the criminal justice system.
National
Commission Against Drunk Driving - The mission of the
National Commission Against Drunk Driving is to continue the
efforts of the Presidential Commission On Drunk Driving to
reduce impaired driving and its tragic consequences by uniting
a broad based coalition of public and private sector organizations
and other concerned individuals who share this common purpose.
National
Drunk Driving Defense Task Force - DUI, driving under
the influence, DWI, OWI, operating while intoxicated as well
as many other terms are what different states commonly refer
to as drunk driving. DUI drunk driving is the most common
criminal charge prosecuted in the United States today and
potential clients must be extremely cautious in deciding what
type of drunk driving lawyer they want to represent them.
DUI drunk driving defense is a very highly specialized area.
The following is a list of symptoms in descending
order of probability that the person observed is driving while
intoxicated. The list is based upon research conducted by
the National Highway Traffic Administration:
- Turning with a wide radius;
- Straddling center of lane marker;
- "Appearing to be drunk";
- Almost striking object or vehicle;
- Weaving;
- Driving on other than designated highway;
- Swerving;
- Speed more than 10 mph below limit;
- Stopping without cause in traffic lane;
- Following too closely;
- Drifting;
- Tires on center or lane marker;
- Braking erratically;
- Driving into opposing or crossing traffic;
- Signaling inconsistent with driving actions;
- Slow response to traffic signals;
- Stopping inappropriately (other than in
lane);
- Turning abruptly or illegally;
- Accelerating or decelerating rapidly;
- Headlights off.
Speeding, incidentally,
is not a symptom of DUI;
in some circumstances it may suggest quicker reflexes and
sobriety.
Are drugs other than alcohol a factor
in motor vehicle crashes?
The role of alcohol as a major factor in motor vehicle crashes
is well established. Much less information is available concerning
the contribution of other drugs. Many legal and illegal drugs
other than alcohol can impair driving ability, even in moderate
concentrations, and may increase crash risk. However, their
use among drivers is apparently quite limited, and there is
presently insufficient scientific evidence that any drug other
than alcohol increases crash likelihood.
Which drugs are most likely to affect
crash risk?
According to a 1988 report from the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration,1 the drugs with "the most potential
to be serious highway safety hazards" are tranquilizers,
sedatives and hypnotics (for example, barbiturates), and marijuana.
What is the potential contribution of
drugs to motor vehicle crashes?
There is not much information on drug use among drivers or
on driver impairment by drugs other than alcohol. Information
on drivers' drug use comes primarily from tests on people
killed in crashes or hospitalized with crash injuries. Most
such studies have found drugs other than alcohol among fewer
than 10 percent (usually fewer than 5 percent) of fatally
injured or hospitalized car drivers. Also, drugs other than
alcohol are infrequently found alone. They are more often
found in combination with high blood alcohol concentrations.
Car drivers' apparently low use of drugs other than alcohol,
especially by themselves, limits the potential contribution
of such drugs to the motor vehicle crash problem.
A 1992 federal study2 revealed that 18 percent
of fatally injured drivers have other drugs in their systems
but that these drugs are most often combined with alcohol.
Alcohol was found in 52 percent of 1,882 fatally injured drivers.
Forty-three percent had blood alcohol concentrations of 0.10
percent or more. Only 6 percent had drugs without alcohol,
and researchers found no evidence that drivers with drugs
but no alcohol are more likely to be responsible for their
crashes, compared with drug-free drivers. The researchers
did find drugs related to crash responsibility when combined
with alcohol or when two or more drugs were found.
A 1993 study3 published in the New England Journal
of Medicine focuses on drivers without alcohol in their systems
who were stopped by police for reckless driving. Urine tests
revealed 45 percent had marijuana and 25 percent had cocaine
in their systems. Although the authors suggest these findings
show drugs to be a bigger problem than alcohol, the data did
not allow this conclusion. All studies that have appropriately
addressed the issue have found alcohol to be by far the greater
problem.
Are drugs other than alcohol a problem
for any particular groups of drivers?
An Institute study of interstate tractor-trailer drivers found
that 29 percent had evidence of alcohol, marijuana, cocaine,
prescription or nonprescription stimulants, or some combination
of these, in either blood or urine. Marijuana was found in
15 percent of the drivers' blood or urine. Nonprescription
stimulants were found in 12 percent, prescription stimulants
in 5 percent, cocaine in 2 percent, and alcohol was found
in fewer than 1 percent.4 A National Transportation Safety
Board investigation of fatal truck crashes found that stimulants
were the most frequently identified drug class among fatally
injured truck drivers (present in 15 percent).5
The extent of driver impairment attributable
to drugs other than alcohol is uncertain because of the complex
relationship between performance and drug concentrations.
The effects of marijuana on driver behavior and crash risk
at the concentrations detected are not known because the psychological
and behavioral effects of marijuana often occur after the
blood concentrations of its principal psychoactive constituent
have peaked and returned to very low levels.
Estimating the effect of stimulants is also
complicated. It is possible that occasional use of such substances
may in the short term enhance the performance of some tasks
by increasing alertness, but some tractor-trailer drivers
may use these drugs to continue on the road for prolonged
periods. Use of stimulants for this purpose is probably frequent
and sustained, not occasional, and thus is potentially dangerous.
Return to
Traffic Accident Research  |